Sheet 3.3 — node assembly drawing Sales team · industrial equipment

+27% to sales conversion in 2 months

An industrial-equipment seller: 15 reps, ~100 calls a day, quality control done by spot-checking recordings for 5–10 hours a week. AI analysis of 100% of conversations lifted conversion by 27% and cut the manager's QA time to 30 minutes.

Sheet3.3  ·  “Cases” series
ProjectAI call-quality control
IndustryIndustrial equipment
AuthorEDEMIUM
StatusLive
TABLE 1 Baseline data

What the client came with

Table 1 — baseline data of the object Measured: before implementation
01 Client An industrial-equipment sales company. Client name withheld.
02 Headcount Sales team: 15 reps
03 Volume ~100 calls a day across the team
04 Pain point Profit slipped 19% over 4 months. Quality control meant spot-checking recordings — 5–10 hours a week of the manager's time.
NODE 2 Failure diagnosis

Where conversion was leaking

The team ran ~100 calls a day, but control rested on one person: the manager spent 5–10 hours a week spot-checking recordings. Whatever made it into the sample got judged by ear; everything else stayed a black box. Profit slipped 19% over 4 months — and there was simply no one to dig for the cause inside the calls by hand.

The scoring was subjective: two of the same rep's calls could get opposite verdicts depending on the reviewer's mood and fatigue. Systematic analytics on reps and on customer objections stood at zero.

Objections like “too expensive,” “not for us,” and “let me think” came up on the line every day — but no one counted them, no one coached the reps on them, and no one could see which of the 15 people kept losing deals at the exact same point.

Chart 1 · profit over the 4 months before implementation
NODE 3 Solution assembly diagram

What we built

SCHEME 3.3 TELEPHONY CRM TRANSCRIPTION AI ANALYSIS 100% OF CALLS WARNING SIGNALS TOO EXPENSIVE · LET ME THINK RANKING OUTPUT: CONVERSION +27% A B C
  1. 01 · INTEGRATION

    CRM and telephony with auto-loading

    CRM and telephony integration: every call recording lands in the analysis system automatically. No manual exports, no “I'll listen to it over the weekend.”

  2. 02 · ANALYSIS

    Transcription + AI review of 100% of calls

    Speech is transcribed to text automatically, AI analyzes every conversation and flags “warning signals”: phrases like “too expensive,” “not for us,” “let me think.”

  3. 03 · RANKINGS

    Tables with rankings and recommendations

    The system compiles tables of rep rankings and per-rep recommendations on its own. The manager is left with 30 minutes a week instead of 5–10 hours of listening.

TABLE 2 Results schedule

Results in numbers

Sales conversion
+27%
in 2 months of the system running
QA time
−80%
was 5–10 h/wk → 30 min
Call coverage
100%
was: spot-check listening
Reps ranked
15
objective scores for each
Chart 2 · sales conversion, index
100 127
Chart 3 · manager's QA time, per week
5–10 H 30 MIN
Table 2 — full metrics schedule Measured: before / after
MetricBeforeAfter
Sales conversion+27% in 2 months
Manager's QA time5–10 h/wk30 min/wk (−80%)
Call-analysis coveragespot-check100% of calls
Rep scoringsubjective, by earobjective rankings
Warning signals (“too expensive,” “let me think”)manual, by earauto-detected across 100% of calls
Analytics on reps and objectionsautomated tables
Profit over the 4 months before implementation−19%
TABLE 3 Timeline and status

Timeline and status

The system was built on top of the existing CRM-and-telephony stack: auto-loaded recordings, transcription and an AI review of every conversation. A measurement 2 months in confirmed it: conversion was up 27%.

The system is live now: it analyzes all ~100 calls a day across 15 reps. The manager reviews ready-made rankings and recommendations — 30 minutes instead of 5–10 hours of listening a week.

Implementation record
MeasurementFirst 2 months of the system running
StatusLive
Capacity~100 calls/day · 15 reps
Exit pointMeasure KPIs on the pilot: target hit → scale